Head to head
Danube AI vs Firefly Iii
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Marketplace gateway: 100+ services and 1,400+ tools behind one MCP connection with unified auth
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security-first, self-hosted MCP server for Firefly III — 152 operations behind 5 scoped tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (80 and 83 out of 100). Danube AI is hosted and callable through the gateway; Firefly Iii runs on your own machine. Firefly Iii has noticeably more public adoption.
| Danube AI | Firefly Iii | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 74 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-03-01 | 2026-09-12 |
| Category | Security | Security |