Mmcp.market

Head to head

SearXNG vs DexL Agents

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SearXNGio.github.danchev/searxng
A
No reviews yet

Privacy-friendly web search through a configurable SearXNG instance.

Full listing
DexL Agentsio.github.dexl-io/agents
B
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call AI gateway: models, speech, web search, on-chain reads and NLP tools, via x402.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG (92/100 against 75). DexL Agents is hosted and callable through the gateway; SearXNG runs on your own machine.

 SearXNGDexL Agents
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B75/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week500–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools15
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0MIT
Last release2026-09-112026-09-17
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

SearXNG vs SearXNG SearchSearXNG vs Zotero MCPSearXNG vs RabbytteSearXNG vs Magpie SearchAll Web search servers