Head to head
inspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail vs mockserver
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
inspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail
Aio.github.DanceNitra/inspeximusNo reviews yet
Self-correcting agent memory: recall, supersede, revert, forget, GDPR erasure, audit receipts.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Mock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 93 out of 100). mockserver has noticeably more public adoption.
| inspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail | mockserver | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 5.0k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |
Other comparisons
inspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail vs ha-mcpinspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail vs IWEinspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail vs fiori-mcp-serverinspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail vs mcp-local-raginspeximus: agent memory with provenance, GDPR erasure and a tamper-evident audit trail vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers