Head to head
DaedalMap Earthquake Data vs Acled
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Global earthquake events from the USGS, 2150 BC-present: magnitude, depth, location, counts.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DaedalMap Earthquake Data (89/100 against 77).
| DaedalMap Earthquake Data | Acled | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |