Head to head
Wikipedia vs Groundhog
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search Wikipedia, read summaries and full text, target sections, find nearby pages, list languages.
Full listingGroundhog
Aio.github.dmytrome/groundhog-mcpNo reviews yet
Search, read and research the web, with hidden text stripped by default and sources hashed
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (93 and 92 out of 100). Wikipedia is hosted and callable through the gateway; Groundhog runs on your own machine.
| Wikipedia | Groundhog | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 396 | 203 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |