Head to head
Pubmed vs Octopart
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search PubMed/Europe PMC, fetch articles and full text (PMC/EPMC/Unpaywall), citations, MeSH terms.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Octopart MCP — electronic component search via the Nexar Supply API (GraphQL)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pubmed (93/100 against 77). Pubmed has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pubmed | Octopart | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 148 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 8.0k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | 39 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |