Head to head
Pentest vs Secobserve
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pentest
?io.github.cyanheads/pentest-mcp-serverNo reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Pentest is hosted and callable through the gateway; Secobserve runs on your own machine. Secobserve has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pentest | Secobserve | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | B83/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 381 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 19 |
| Write actions | — | 6 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |