Head to head
Openlibrary vs Nasa Images
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search books and authors, fetch editions, browse subjects, and resolve cover images.
Full listingNasa Images
Cio.github.mrfentmen/nasa-images-mcpNo reviews yet
Search the NASA image and video library. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Openlibrary (93/100 against 65). Openlibrary is hosted and callable through the gateway; Nasa Images runs on your own machine. Openlibrary has noticeably more public adoption.
| Openlibrary | Nasa Images | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 4 | – |
| Downloads / week | 428 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |