Mmcp.market

Head to head

Noaa Spaceweather vs Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Noaa Spaceweatherio.github.cyanheads/noaa-spaceweather-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

NOAA SWPC space weather: storm scales, Kp index, aurora forecasts, solar wind, activity, alerts.

Full listing
Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrateai.slidingbox/hydrate-dehydrate
A
No reviews yet

Encrypted one-time secret handoff, x402 pre-flight, and web page change checks and watches.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Noaa Spaceweather (93/100 against 85). Noaa Spaceweather is hosted and callable through the gateway; Slidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate runs on your own machine.

 Noaa SpaceweatherSlidingbox Hydrate/Dehydrate
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA93/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars20
Downloads / week430358
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools6
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0ISC
Last release2026-09-172026-09-17
CategoryMaps and travelMaps and travel

Other comparisons