Head to head
mcp-ts-core vs PatchX Freenote Agent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
PatchX Freenote MCP: summaries, memories, model results and user-approved webhook workflows.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PatchX Freenote Agent (92/100 against 55). mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-ts-core | PatchX Freenote Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 151 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 33k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | UNLICENSED |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |