Mmcp.market

Head to head

mcp-ts-core vs visual-intent-layer

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

mcp-ts-coreio.github.cyanheads/mcp-ts-core
C
No reviews yet

Agent-native TypeScript framework for MCP servers.

Full listing
visual-intent-layerio.github.willa-code/visual-intent-layer
A
No reviews yet

Point at visible targets in an agent-built interface, and deliver grounded Annotations.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours visual-intent-layer (89/100 against 55). mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.

 mcp-ts-corevisual-intent-layer
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A89/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars1510
Downloads / week33k69
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

mcp-ts-core vs ha-mcpmcp-ts-core vs IWEmcp-ts-core vs fiori-mcp-servermcp-ts-core vs mcp-local-ragmcp-ts-core vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers