Head to head
mcp-ts-core vs Patchloom
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent-safe structured edits: JSON/YAML/TOML/md/AST, dry-run, batch/tx. Not a filesystem MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Patchloom (75/100 against 55). mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-ts-core | Patchloom | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 151 | 17 |
| Downloads / week | 33k | 354 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |