Mmcp.market

Head to head

mcp-ts-core vs accessibility-statement-lint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

mcp-ts-coreio.github.cyanheads/mcp-ts-core
C
No reviews yet

Agent-native TypeScript framework for MCP servers.

Full listing
accessibility-statement-lintio.github.jmshinhwa/accessibility-statement-lint
A
No reviews yet

Checks the accessibility statement you already published against the EU model statement and its two

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours accessibility-statement-lint (89/100 against 55). mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.

 mcp-ts-coreaccessibility-statement-lint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A89/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars1510
Downloads / week33k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0NOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

mcp-ts-core vs ha-mcpmcp-ts-core vs mcpmcp-ts-core vs IWEmcp-ts-core vs fiori-mcp-servermcp-ts-core vs mcp-local-ragAll AI and agents servers