Mmcp.market

Head to head

mcp-ts-core vs ironclaw

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

mcp-ts-coreio.github.cyanheads/mcp-ts-core
C
No reviews yet

Agent-native TypeScript framework for MCP servers.

Full listing
ironclawio.github.IronSecCo/ironclaw
B
No reviews yet

Sandboxed shell exec for MCP clients: run untrusted agent commands in a gVisor container.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ironclaw (70/100 against 55). mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.

 mcp-ts-coreironclaw
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100B70/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars15119
Downloads / week33k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

mcp-ts-core vs ha-mcpmcp-ts-core vs IWEmcp-ts-core vs fiori-mcp-servermcp-ts-core vs mcp-local-ragmcp-ts-core vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers