Head to head
mcp-ts-core vs mcpm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcpm (83/100 against 55). mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-ts-core | mcpm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 151 | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 33k | 529 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |