Head to head
Cyanheads vs SearXNG Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fleet discovery for the cyanheads MCP ecosystem — semantic search + install snippets.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cyanheads (93/100 against 83). Cyanheads is hosted and callable through the gateway; SearXNG Search runs on your own machine. SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cyanheads | SearXNG Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | – | 9.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |