Head to head
Gdelt vs Court Records
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search and analyze global news coverage and US TV transcripts via the GDELT Project APIs.
Full listingCourt Records
Cio.github.mrfentmen/court-records-mcpNo reviews yet
Search published US court opinions from the Caselaw Access Project. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Gdelt (93/100 against 65). Gdelt is hosted and callable through the gateway; Court Records runs on your own machine. Gdelt has noticeably more public adoption.
| Gdelt | Court Records | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 5 | – |
| Downloads / week | 212 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |