Head to head
Faostat vs Domotz MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
UN FAOSTAT global food & agriculture statistics over a local SQLite mirror, via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Every Domotz endpoint, plus a local SQLite fleet mirror that answers cross-site questions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Faostat (86/100 against 75). Faostat is hosted and callable through the gateway; Domotz MCP runs on your own machine.
| Faostat | Domotz MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | 180 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |