Head to head
Faostat vs SQLite rowid integer band, value discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
UN FAOSTAT global food & agriculture statistics over a local SQLite mirror, via MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 91 out of 100). Faostat has noticeably more public adoption.
| Faostat | SQLite rowid integer band, value discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 180 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 30 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |