Head to head
Eur Lex vs Pacer
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search EU legislation, CJEU case law, and treaties; traverse CELLAR graph; browse EuroVoc concepts.
Full listingNo reviews yet
PACER Case Locator (PCL) MCP — live US federal court case & party search on the
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Eur Lex (86/100 against 77). Eur Lex has noticeably more public adoption.
| Eur Lex | Pacer | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 814 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | 38 |
| Write actions | 1 | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |