Head to head
eur-lex-mcp-server vs DocsMint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search EU legislation, CJEU case law, and treaties; traverse CELLAR graph; browse EuroVoc concepts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Cloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DocsMint (96/100 against 86). DocsMint has noticeably more public adoption.
| eur-lex-mcp-server | DocsMint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 55 |
| Downloads / week | – | 983 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |