Head to head
Courtlistener vs HasData Google Scholar
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search US court opinions, federal dockets, judges, citations, and oral arguments via CourtListener.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (93 and 100 out of 100).
| Courtlistener | HasData Google Scholar | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 10 |
| Downloads / week | 612 | 41 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 14 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |