Head to head
Bluesky vs Twitter/X MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read public X posts, replies, profiles, and search results through Rettiwt or the official API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 83 out of 100). Bluesky is hosted and callable through the gateway; Twitter/X MCP runs on your own machine.
| Bluesky | Twitter/X MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 178 | 23 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | 5 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | ISC |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |