Head to head
Arxiv vs Lacuna Research MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (93 and 94 out of 100). Arxiv is hosted and callable through the gateway; Lacuna Research MCP runs on your own machine. Arxiv has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arxiv | Lacuna Research MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | 1.1k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |