Head to head
SQL Server MCP vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
SQL Server MCP
Aio.github.cvelasquez/mcp-sqlserverNo reviews yet
MCP server for DBAs running dozens of SQL Server instances: grouped connections, plans, indexes
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 82 out of 100). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; SQL Server MCP runs on your own machine.
| SQL Server MCP | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |