Head to head
MCP vs Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
LinkedIn actions for AI agents: search, messaging, posts and invites, as hosted MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
LinkedIn for AI agents: inbox, invitations, Sales Navigator search, posts. Quotas and webhooks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (98/100 against 67). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Reach MCP — LinkedIn for AI agents | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 52 |
| Write actions | — | 21 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |