Head to head
CSS Crème vs Fiori
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Give your agent a real design system: tokens, measured WCAG contrast, and rules to follow.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 86 out of 100). CSS Crème is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fiori runs on your own machine. Fiori has noticeably more public adoption.
| CSS Crème | Fiori | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 156 |
| Downloads / week | – | 77k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |