Head to head
CSS Crème vs llmtrim
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Give your agent a real design system: tokens, measured WCAG contrast, and rules to follow.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server and proxy that compresses LLM prompts, tool output, and replies to cut token cost.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 92 out of 100). CSS Crème is hosted and callable through the gateway; llmtrim runs on your own machine. llmtrim has noticeably more public adoption.
| CSS Crème | llmtrim | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 236 |
| Downloads / week | – | 220 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |