Mmcp.market

Head to head

Blindoracle vs MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Blindoracleio.github.craigmbrown/blindoracle
A
No reviews yet

Trust layer for the x402 agent economy: 40 pay-per-call SKUs, USDC on Base, verifiable proofs.

Full listing
MCP Serverio.github.roamzy-io/mcp-server
B
No reviews yet

Agent-native global eSIM: buy for 193 countries, per-MB in USDT/USDC. Agents earn 20% referral.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Blindoracle (88/100 against 78). MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 BlindoracleMCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA88/100B78/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars03
Downloads / week–456
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools—12
Write actions—2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-07
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Blindoracle vs AuscaBlindoracle vs MaginaryBlindoracle vs BridgeNode MCPBlindoracle vs DvalincodeBlindoracle vs Agent WormholeAll AI and agents servers