Head to head
mail-muncher vs PipesHub
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Filtered, read-only IMAP and Gmail archived to disk as .eml + markdown, served over MCP.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Permissioned search and cited answers over Slack, Drive, Gmail, Jira, and 50+ workplace sources.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mail-muncher (88/100 against 67). PipesHub is hosted and callable through the gateway; mail-muncher runs on your own machine.
| mail-muncher | PipesHub | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category |