Head to head
rag-rat vs hubmesh
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Repository intelligence, code graph, history, papertrail, and cross-agent memory for coding agents.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deterministic multi-hop graph retrieval for RAG. Zero LLM calls in the query path.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours hubmesh (92/100 against 75). rag-rat has noticeably more public adoption.
| rag-rat | hubmesh | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 20 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 330 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |