Head to head
CortexPlus vs Clippy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Personal memory layer: files, notes, messages, tasks and email, semantically indexed.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Copy AI-generated content to the macOS clipboard: rich Gmail-ready email drafts, text, and files
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Clippy (88/100 against 60). CortexPlus is hosted and callable through the gateway; Clippy runs on your own machine. Clippy has noticeably more public adoption.
| CortexPlus | Clippy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 247 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-04 |
| Category |