Head to head
CoralSwarm Connect vs socraticode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search and save your coding work in a CoralSwarm ocean: sessions, decisions, meetings.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for enterprise local codebase indexing, semantic search, and code dependency graphs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CoralSwarm Connect (98/100 against 65). CoralSwarm Connect is hosted and callable through the gateway; socraticode runs on your own machine. socraticode has noticeably more public adoption.
| CoralSwarm Connect | socraticode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3.3k |
| Downloads / week | – | 5.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |