Head to head
ResearchSprint vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ResearchSprint
Cio.github.conversiondigital-cmyk/research-sprintNo reviews yet
AI research reports: market analysis, competitor intel, blog posts. USDC payment.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Crypto market intelligence: prices, funding rates, narratives, regime, and delta-neutral research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (91/100 against 57). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| ResearchSprint | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 96 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 4 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |