Head to head
ContrastAPI vs LayerCall
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
55 tools, 7 Resources, Sigma rules, email SPF/DMARC, MITRE, CVE/KEV, risk_score. No key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Score an IP, email, phone, domain or device for fraud in one call, with the signals behind it.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours LayerCall (89/100 against 73). ContrastAPI has noticeably more public adoption.
| ContrastAPI | LayerCall | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 34 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 55 | 7 |
| Write actions | 4 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category |