Head to head
ContextStream MCP Server vs Nuramem
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cross-model memory for people and teams: one memory every AI you use loads at session start.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ContextStream MCP Server (96/100 against 70). ContextStream MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| ContextStream MCP Server | Nuramem | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A96/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 43 | – |
| Downloads / week | 964 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |