Head to head
Contentrain vs Feldspar free repository security scan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Git-native content governance for AI agents — 27 deterministic MCP tools over stdio and HTTP.
Full listingFeldspar free repository security scan
Acom.project-feldspar/scanNo reviews yet
Free deterministic security scan of public git repos: OSV.dev vulnerable deps, secrets, config lint.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 88 out of 100). Contentrain has noticeably more public adoption.
| Contentrain | Feldspar free repository security scan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.4k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-05 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |