Head to head
kubernetes-mcp-server vs Edgegap
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deploy and operate multiplayer game servers on Edgegap's global edge network.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 92 out of 100). Edgegap is hosted and callable through the gateway; kubernetes-mcp-server runs on your own machine. kubernetes-mcp-server has noticeably more public adoption.
| kubernetes-mcp-server | Edgegap | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2.1k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 8.3k | 547 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |