Head to head
Substack MCP Server vs deja-vu
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Substack drafts, Notes, analytics and consented subscribers. Long-form posts stay draft-only.
Full listingdeja-vu
Aio.github.vshulcz/deja-vuNo reviews yet
deja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours deja-vu (92/100 against 83).
| Substack MCP Server | deja-vu | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 35 | 847 |
| Downloads / week | 591 | 929 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |