Head to head
Conduit Mail vs Microsoft Teams API
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Your mailbox for MCP clients: search, read, draft, send, rules and notes. Sending is off by default.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI-native Microsoft Teams integration — read chats, send messages, search people
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Microsoft Teams API (83/100 against 70). Conduit Mail is hosted and callable through the gateway; Microsoft Teams API runs on your own machine. Microsoft Teams API has noticeably more public adoption.
| Conduit Mail | Microsoft Teams API | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 8 |
| Downloads / week | – | 187 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |