Mmcp.market

Head to head

Rede vs Canary

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Redeio.github.codespar/mcp-rede
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for Rede — Itaú-owned BR acquirer: authorize/capture/refund, zero-auth, card tokens

Full listing
Canaryio.github.mindstone/mcp-server-canary
A
No reviews yet

Mindstone-internal release-pipeline test connector; not for use. Single ping tool; no auth.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Canary (94/100 against 82).

 RedeCanary
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB82/100A94/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars27112
Downloads / week2541
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools221
Write actions7—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-08-292026-09-13
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Rede vs Auth Token ServiceRede vs Gkmex Crane InventoryRede vs MCPProxyRede vs spintax.net MCP serverRede vs Healthclaw GuardrailsAll Security servers