Head to head
Pagar Me vs Esimfly
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Pagar.me — orders, charges, recipients, transfers, plans, subscriptions, webhooks
Full listingNo reviews yet
eSIMfly Business API: search eSIM plans, check usage, diagnose eSIMs, optionally order (confirmed)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Esimfly (96/100 against 82). Esimfly is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pagar Me runs on your own machine.
| Pagar Me | Esimfly | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 271 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 627 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 22 | — |
| Write actions | 16 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-29 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |