Head to head
Caf vs Rxnorm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Caf — Brazilian KYC/KYB: face auth + liveness, document OCR, orchestrated onboarding
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 87 out of 100). Rxnorm is hosted and callable through the gateway; Caf runs on your own machine. Caf has noticeably more public adoption.
| Caf | Rxnorm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 271 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 18 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-29 | 2026-09-25 |
| Category | Security | Security |