Head to head
Caf vs Gera Compliance
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Caf — Brazilian KYC/KYB: face auth + liveness, document OCR, orchestrated onboarding
Full listing
No reviews yet
Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act and look up obligations and articles. Offline, no auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Caf (82/100 against 68). Caf has noticeably more public adoption.
| Caf | Gera Compliance | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 271 | – |
| Downloads / week | 18 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 9 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-29 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |