Head to head
Email vs SenderKit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
IMAP/SMTP email MCP server — 52 tools, stdio + HTTP, IMAP IDLE push, multi-account, AI triage.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SenderKit (100/100 against 74). SenderKit is hosted and callable through the gateway; Email runs on your own machine. Email has noticeably more public adoption.
| SenderKit | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 117 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 1.2k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-26 | 2026-09-01 |
| Category |