Head to head
Sites by Clize vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Ship a real marketing site from your coding agent: domain, HTTPS and a working inbox.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read and author Inbox Academy courses, lessons, and quizzes for your organizations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Sites by Clize (86/100 against 70). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sites by Clize runs on your own machine.
| Sites by Clize | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 66 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-07-17 | — |
| Category |