Head to head
Clearhouse vs Protect
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
One search across every agent registry: 100K+ MCP/A2A/x402 services, signed receipts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Clearhouse (85/100 against 65). Clearhouse is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine. Protect has noticeably more public adoption.
| Clearhouse | Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.6k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | 12 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |