Head to head
Cleanor vs three.ws Vision
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Zero-auth MCP: image optimize, cited storage/format data, and dev utilities LLMs get wrong.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Image understanding for AI agents — analyze and describe any image via the three.ws pipeline.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Vision (92/100 against 82). Cleanor is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Vision runs on your own machine. three.ws Vision has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cleanor | three.ws Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 213 |
| Downloads / week | 53 | 58 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 22 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-14 | 2026-09-25 |
| Category | Media | Media |