Head to head
Pipedrive CRM vs Fikst
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for Pipedrive CRM. 155 tools for deals, persons, organizations, activities, and more.
Full listingNo reviews yet
CRM and field service for Dutch installation companies. Configure your whole environment.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pipedrive CRM (83/100 against 67). Fikst is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pipedrive CRM runs on your own machine. Pipedrive CRM has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pipedrive CRM | Fikst | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 8 | – |
| Downloads / week | 152 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 100 | — |
| Write actions | 51 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |