Head to head
Citlyze vs Courtlistener
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only access to your Citlyze workspace: AI search visibility, citations, and recommendations.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search US court opinions, federal dockets, judges, citations, and oral arguments via CourtListener.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Courtlistener (93/100 against 60). Courtlistener has noticeably more public adoption.
| Citlyze | Courtlistener | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 612 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 14 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |